Another Story

Whether it be love, life or loss.

Thought

with one comment

Wouldn’t the world be a better place if we could just simply continue using fossil fuel?

The environmentalist minded are currently going “this guy is crazy” on me probably. However, supposedly by our worst case scenario, the global warming at the current rate will raise global temperature by 1 degree celcius in the next 100 years, raising sea levels, melting polar ice caps, killing white furred cute polar bears, and devastating coastal cities around the world.

But, we can reverse it in such a simple manner, I almost think that the hype about the global warming is a carefully constructed contrivance by the energy sector to change our source of energy from oil to renewable forms of power.

The counter plans  I’ve seen on televisions range from planting cloud seeds to covering earth with a white plastic materials to reflect light. Claims of some authors I’ve heard are that we’re already too late to fix the world, and our only method of survival is complete overhaul of our industry to be carbon neutral.  Many environmentalists, scientists, politicians, activists, and businessmen all worry (or profit) from an effect known as greenhouse.

The solution I think is quite plausible. Gases in our “atmosphere” beneath the stratosphere cause capturing of heat through resonance frequency within the particles of CO2 and water, so they re-radiate the heat reflected from the surface and radiated from the sun.

What if we put gases into our stratosphere to prevent the sun’s heat from reaching our atmosphere in the first place? Mount Pinatubo eruption in 1991 spewed “aerosols formed a global layer of sulfuric acid haze. Global temperatures dropped by about 0.5C” (Yes, this is from wikipedia) So can we not artificially release same such amount of the eruption, in “one shot” to cancel out five decades worth of temperature increase by the most extreme climate model?

No ways, the clean energy lobbyists are probably gonna clean congress up of such simple solution.

If we can just find a substitute of a less harmful sounding chemical and put it into stratosphere to cause this “volcanic ash shield” in the space above our air, global warming hype is probably gonna die out faster than the global cooling hype back in the 1970. (Google it up, it’s true.)

Then happy world for another century or so.

-byk

Advertisement

Written by bykstory

October 6, 2010 at 5:21 am

Posted in Uncategorized

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Actually, I was reading a book called Superfreakonomics and it talks about a company that’s been working on really simple solutions for climate change. One of their solutions is what you posted here, to spray sulfur into the atmosphere (it’s clear, odorless, and innocuous). It’s also ridiculously cheap. :)

    Sukwan

    October 12, 2010 at 6:17 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.